Cost Accounting — 2023
KNEC Diploma in Supply Chain Management, Module II. Original theory examination questions with explained model answers for revision.
March/April 2023
Paper codes: 2903/206; 2906/206; 2907/206; 2922/206
Time: 3 hours
Instructions: Answer any FIVE questions. All questions carry equal marks. Answer the questions in English.
Question 1(a) — 8 marks
Highlight four ways in which a cost accounting system enhances efficiency in an organization.
Model answer
- Identifies the cost of products, services and activities for informed decisions.
- Compares actual costs with budgets or standards to reveal waste.
- Supports pricing, planning and economical resource allocation.
- Assigns cost responsibility and provides information for corrective action.
Question 1(b) — 12 marks
Kemaks Limited uses material XP in its production. The following information relates to the material for the month of October 2022.
2022 Transaction October 1 Balance b/f 76 metres valued Ksh 6,840 2 Received 170 metres at Ksh 100 per metre 4 Issued 110 metres 8 Received 50 metres at Ksh 98 per metre 14 Issued 80 metres 20 Issued 20 metres 27 Received 200 metres at Ksh 96 per metre 31 Issued 130 metres Prepare a stores ledger account using the simple average method.
Model answer
Opening unit price = 6,840 ÷ 76 = Ksh 90. Average the quoted prices of the lots represented in stock before each issue, without weighting by quantities.
| Date | Receipt Ksh | Issue: rate calculation × qty = Ksh | Balance qty | Balance Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | 76 | 6,840 | ||
| Oct 2 | 170 × 100 = 17,000 | 246 | 23,840 | |
| Oct 4 | (90 + 100)/2 × 110 = 10,450 | 136 | 13,390 | |
| Oct 8 | 50 × 98 = 4,900 | 186 | 18,290 | |
| Oct 14 | (100 + 98)/2 × 80 = 7,920 | 106 | 10,370 | |
| Oct 20 | (100 + 98)/2 × 20 = 1,980 | 86 | 8,390 | |
| Oct 27 | 200 × 96 = 19,200 | 286 | 27,590 | |
| Oct 31 | (100 + 98 + 96)/3 × 130 = 12,740 | 156 | 14,850 |
Closing stock: 156 units; ledger value Ksh 14,850. The simple average ignores quantities when averaging the prices of lots still represented in stock. FIFO quantity tracking is used only to identify exhausted lots. Therefore the closing ledger value need not equal the remaining physical quantity multiplied by the latest receipt price.
Question 2(a) — 8 marks
Explain each of the following types of costs:
(i) opportunity cost; (2 marks)
(ii) sunk cost; (2 marks)
(iii) differential cost; (2 marks)
(iv) joint cost. (2 marks)
Model answer
- Opportunity cost: the benefit forgone by choosing one alternative instead of the next best alternative.
- Sunk cost: a cost already incurred that cannot be changed by the present decision.
- Differential cost: the difference in total cost between the alternatives being considered.
- Joint cost: a common processing cost incurred before two or more joint products become separately identifiable.
Question 2(b) — 12 marks
Safi Limited manufactures sanitizers using chemical XT 20. The following information relates to the company for the year 2022.
Particulars Information Cost of placing an order Ksh 120 Cost per litre Ksh 150 Carrying cost per unit per annum 10% of purchase price Usage per week 70–90 litres Reorder period 3–7 weeks Take 1 year = 52 weeks. Determine the:
(i) reorder level;
(ii) minimum stock level;
(iii) economic order quantity (EOQ)
(iv) maximum sock level;
(v) average stock level.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Average weekly use | (70 + 90)/2 | 80 litres |
| Annual demand | 80 × 52 | 4,160 litres |
| Annual holding cost per litre | 150 × 10% | 15 |
| Average lead time | (3 + 7)/2 | 5 weeks |
| (i) Reorder level | 90 × 7 | 630 litres |
| (ii) Minimum stock | 630 − 80 × 5 | 230 litres |
| (iii) EOQ | √(2 × 4,160 × 120 ÷ 15) | 257.99 |
| (iv) Maximum stock | 630 + 257.992248 − 70 × 3 | 677.99 |
| (v) Average stock | 230 + 257.992248/2 | 359.00 |
Use approximately 258 litres per order. The average-stock calculation uses safety stock plus half the order quantity.
Question 3(a) — 9 marks
Mema Limited has two production departments P and Q and one service department X. The following overheads were incurred during the year 2022.
Particulars Ksh Indirect labour 1,522,000 Lighting 320,000 Depreciation of plant 480,000 Rent 1,200,000 Cost drivers
Driver P Q X Floor Area (m²) 50 20 30 Number of employees 14 4 2 Value of plant (Ksh. million) 10 9 5 Prepare an overhead analysis sheet
Model answer
The supplied scan awards 9 marks to this part; that mark is retained. No secondary-apportionment basis for service department X is supplied, so its cost remains separately identified.
Allocate each cost in the ratio of its relevant driver. Total employees = 20; floor area = 100 m²; plant value = Ksh 24 million.
| Overhead | Basis | Total Ksh | P Ksh | Q Ksh | X Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect labour | Employees 14:4:2 | 1,522,000 | 1,065,400 | 304,400 | 152,200 |
| Lighting | Floor area 50:20:30 | 320,000 | 160,000 | 64,000 | 96,000 |
| Plant depreciation | Plant values 10:9:5 | 480,000 | 200,000 | 180,000 | 100,000 |
| Rent | Floor area 50:20:30 | 1,200,000 | 600,000 | 240,000 | 360,000 |
| Total | 3,522,000 | 2,025,400 | 788,400 | 708,200 |
Question 3(b) — 12 marks
Jambo Enterprises manufactures cleaning detergent which passes through two processes to completion. The following information relates to the processes:
Particulars Process I Ksh Process II Ksh Direct materials introduced (2800) units 420,000 — Direct wages 300,000 380,000 Additional information:
(i) Production overheads are absorbed at 75% of direct wages;
(ii) The outputs from process I and process II were 2600 units and 2392 units respectively.
(iii) A normal loss of 8% is expected in each process;
(iv) The scrap units are sold at Ksh 30 per unit.
Prepare
(i) Process I account;
(ii) Process II account.
Model answer
Process I overhead = 300,000 × 75% = 225,000; Process II overhead = 380,000 × 75% = 285,000. Retain full precision when transferring costs between processes.
Jambo — Process I
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Total input | 2800 + 0 | 2,800 |
| Total cost | Transfer + materials + wages + overheads + expenses | 945,000 |
| Normal loss | 2800 × 8% | 224 |
| Expected output | 2800 − 224 | 2,576 |
| Normal scrap value | 224 × 30 | 6,720 |
| Cost per good unit | (945,000 − 6,720) ÷ 2576 | 364.24 |
| Actual output value | 2600 × 364.239130 | 947,021.74 |
| Abnormal gain | 2600 − 2576 | 24 |
| Dr particulars | Units | Ksh | Cr particulars | Units | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input / transfer | 2,800 | 0 | Normal loss | 224 | 6,720 |
| Materials introduced | 420,000 | Output transferred | 2,600 | 947,021.74 | |
| Direct wages | 300,000 | ||||
| Overheads | 225,000 | ||||
| Abnormal gain | 24 | 8,741.74 | |||
| Total | 2,824 | 953,741.74 | Total | 2,824 | 953,741.74 |
Jambo — Process II
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Total input | 2600 + 0 | 2,600 |
| Total cost | Transfer + materials + wages + overheads + expenses | 1,612,021.74 |
| Normal loss | 2600 × 8% | 208 |
| Expected output | 2600 − 208 | 2,392 |
| Normal scrap value | 208 × 30 | 6,240 |
| Cost per good unit | (1,612,021.74 − 6,240) ÷ 2392 | 671.31 |
| Actual output value | 2392 × 671.313436 | 1,605,781.74 |
| Abnormal gain | 2392 − 2392 | 0 |
| Dr particulars | Units | Ksh | Cr particulars | Units | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input / transfer | 2,600 | 947,021.74 | Normal loss | 208 | 6,240 |
| Direct wages | 380,000 | Output transferred | 2,392 | 1,605,781.74 | |
| Overheads | 285,000 | ||||
| Total | 2,600 | 1,612,021.74 | Total | 2,600 | 1,612,021.74 |
Process I has an abnormal gain of 24 units. Process II output equals the expected 2,392 units, so it has no abnormal loss or gain.
Question 4(a) — 8 marks
Outline four advantages of piece rate method of remunerating employees.
Model answer
- Directly links earnings to measurable output.
- Encourages productive employees to increase output.
- Simplifies determination of direct labour cost per unit.
- Can reduce close time supervision when output and quality are properly checked.
Question 4(b) — 12 marks
Batutu Limited has received an offer of Ksh. 5,500,000 from a customer for Job No. 177 X. The following information relates to the job.
Particulars Cutting Stitching Direct materials (Ksh) 250,000 160,000 Direct labour (Ksh) 1,500,000 1,000,000 Direct labour hours 12,000 25,000 Machine hours 10,000 18,000 The following estimates relate to the departments
Particulars Cutting Stitching Factory overheads (Ksh) 4,500,000 6,400,000 Direct labour hours 90,000 80,000 Machine hours 20,000 160,000 Additional information:
Factory overheads in the cutting and stitching departments are absorbed on the basis of direct labour hours and machine hours respectively.
The firms mark up profit is 24%.
(i) Prepare a cost statement for Job 1777 X
(ii) Advise the management on whether to accept the offer or not.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Cutting absorption rate | 4,500,000 ÷ 90,000 | Ksh 50 per labour hour |
| Stitching absorption rate | 6,400,000 ÷ 160,000 | Ksh 40 per machine hour |
| Direct materials | 250,000 + 160,000 | 410,000 |
| Direct labour | 1,500,000 + 1,000,000 | 2,500,000 |
| Cutting overhead | 12,000 × 50 | 600,000 |
| Stitching overhead | 18,000 × 40 | 720,000 |
| Total job cost | 410,000 + 2,500,000 + 600,000 + 720,000 | 4,230,000 |
| Required profit | 4,230,000 × 24% | 1,015,200 |
| Required quotation | 4,230,000 + 1,015,200 | 5,245,200 |
| Profit at offer | 5,500,000 − 4,230,000 | 1,270,000 |
Accept the offer on the supplied cost and markup criterion: Ksh 5,500,000 exceeds the required Ksh 5,245,200 by Ksh 254,800. The printed reference changes from Job 177 X to Job 1777 X; the same supplied figures are used.
Question 5(a) — 8 marks
Highlight four features of batch costing.
Model answer
- A batch of similar units is treated as the cost object.
- Direct materials and labour are recorded for each batch.
- Setup and overhead costs are charged or apportioned to the batch.
- Unit cost is total batch cost divided by the number of good units in the batch.
Question 5(b) — 12 marks
Chemikal Limited was awarded a contract of Ksh. 20 million to build a hospital block. The following relates to the contract for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Particulars Ksh Plant at site (1 January 2022) 10,000,000 Plant at site (31 December 2022) 7,800,000 Material purchases 2,400,000 Material at site (31 December 2022) 1,100,000 Establishment charges 150,000 Subcontractor fee 450,000 Direct labour 1,300,000 Indirect labour 500,000 Value of work certified 8,000,000 Cost of work not yet done 1,500,000 Cash received 4,500,000 It is the policy of the firm to take a third of the notional profit to the income statement. Prepare a:
(i) contract account;
(ii) contractee account.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Plant depreciation | 10,000,000 − 7,800,000 | 2,200,000 |
| Materials consumed | 2,400,000 − 1,100,000 | 1,300,000 |
| Cost incurred | 2,200,000 + 1,300,000 + 150,000 + 450,000 + 1,300,000 + 500,000 | 5,900,000 |
| Notional profit — literal wording | 8,000,000 − 5,900,000 | 2,100,000 |
| Profit transferred under stated policy | 2,100,000 × 1/3 | 700,000 |
| Profit reserved | 2,100,000 − 700,000 | 1,400,000 |
Chemikal — Contract account (literal supplied wording)
| Dr — Particulars | Ksh | Cr — Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant opening | 10,000,000 | Closing plant | 7,800,000 |
| Materials purchased | 2,400,000 | Closing materials | 1,100,000 |
| Establishment charges | 150,000 | Work certified | 8,000,000 |
| Subcontractor fee | 450,000 | ||
| Direct labour | 1,300,000 | ||
| Indirect labour | 500,000 | ||
| Notional profit | 2,100,000 | ||
| Total | 16,900,000 | Total | 16,900,000 |
Contractee account
| Dr — Particulars | Ksh | Cr — Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work certified | 8,000,000 | Cash received | 4,500,000 |
| Balance c/d | 3,500,000 | ||
| Total | 8,000,000 | Total | 8,000,000 |
Balance b/d: Ksh 3,500,000 Dr.
The printed Ksh 1,500,000 is described as “Cost of work not yet done”. Future unperformed work is not added as completed work-in-progress. If the intended phrase was “work done but not certified”, the alternative notional profit is 8,000,000 + 1,500,000 − 5,900,000 = Ksh 3,600,000; one-third transferred is Ksh 1,200,000 and the reserve is Ksh 2,400,000. The contractee balance remains Ksh 3,500,000.
Question 6(a) — 8 marks
Highlight four differences between cost accounting and financial accounting.
Model answer
| Cost accounting | Financial accounting |
|---|---|
| Primarily supports internal planning and control. | Primarily reports overall results and financial position to users. |
| Analyses products, jobs, processes and activities in detail. | Summarises the organisation’s transactions and balances. |
| Reports can be prepared as frequently as management needs. | Periodic statements follow the required reporting cycle. |
| Methods and formats are tailored to management needs. | General-purpose statements follow the applicable reporting framework. |
Question 6(b) — 12 marks
Hanson Limited intends to acquire either machine FX 210 or FX 211. The following details relate to the machines:
Particulars FX 210 FX 211 Initial cost Ksh 490,000 368,000 Security fee per annum Ksh 30,000 33,000 Maintenance cost per annum Ksh 170,000 180,000 Direct labour per annum Ksh 21,840 24,960 Power cost per day Ksh 280 300 Expected economic life in years 4 4 Salvage value Ksh 184,000 134,000 Take 1 year = 365 days
(i) Prepare operating costs statements for each machine.
(ii) Advise the management on the machine to purchase.
Model answer
| Annual operating cost / working | FX 210 Ksh | FX 211 Ksh |
|---|---|---|
| Depreciation: (cost − salvage)/4 | 76,500 | 58,500 |
| Security | 30,000 | 33,000 |
| Maintenance | 170,000 | 180,000 |
| Direct labour | 21,840 | 24,960 |
| Power: daily cost × 365 | 102,200 | 109,500 |
| Total annual cost | 400,540 | 405,960 |
Choose FX 210 on the supplied equal-life cost comparison: it saves Ksh 405,960 − 400,540 = Ksh 5,420 annually, or Ksh 21,680 over four years. This comparison assumes comparable service capacity and excludes discounting because no discount rate is supplied.
Question 7(a) — 8 marks
Explain each of the following terms as used in process costing:
(i) normal loss; (2 marks)
(ii) abnormal loss; (2 marks)
(iii) scrap value; (2 marks)
(iv) abnormal gain. (2 marks)
Model answer
- Normal loss: the expected unavoidable reduction in input under efficient operating conditions.
- Abnormal loss: actual loss above the expected normal allowance, costed separately for investigation.
- Scrap value: the amount recoverable from selling rejected or lost material.
- Abnormal gain: the improvement when actual loss is below the normal allowance, so good output exceeds expected output.
Question 7(b) — 12 marks
Abax Limited has three employees, Janet, Abdalla and Moris. The following information relates to the three employees for the month of June 2022.
Employee Time rate per hour Number of hours worked Allowed output per hour (units) Actual output units Janet 100 38 70 2,520 Abdallah 95 41 60 2,700 Moris 90 42 68 2,720 Bonus is paid at half the normal rate. For each employee, determine:
(i) basic wage;
(ii) gross wage.
Model answer
Standard time = actual output ÷ allowed output per hour. Basic wage = actual hours × rate. Apply the stated half-rate bonus to positive time saved; no negative bonus is charged.
| Employee | Standard hours | Actual hours | Time saved | Basic Ksh | Bonus working | Bonus Ksh | Gross Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet | 2,520/70 = 36 | 38 | 0 | 3,800 | No saving | 0 | 3,800 |
| Abdallah | 2,700/60 = 45 | 41 | 4 | 3,895 | 4 × 95 × 1/2 | 190 | 4,085 |
| Moris | 2,720/68 = 40 | 42 | 0 | 3,780 | No saving | 0 | 3,780 |
June/July 2023
Paper codes: 2903/206; 2906/206; 2907/206; 2914/206; 2922/206; 2924/206; 2925/206
Time: 3 hours
Instructions: Answer any FIVE questions. Show all your workings. Answer the questions in English.
Question 1(a) — 8 marks
Explain four factors that should be considered when choosing a method of remunerating employees in an organization.
Model answer
- Nature of work: measurable repetitive output may suit piece rates, while variable or team work may need time or group measures.
- Quality and safety: rewards must not encourage unsafe speed or defective output.
- Fairness and motivation: the method should provide understandable and equitable incentives.
- Cost and administration: the organisation needs reliable measurement, affordable rewards and compliance with applicable employment requirements.
Question 1(b) — 12 marks
The following information relates to overheads incurred by Santah Limited for the year 2022.
Department Ksh Absorption base Number of hours X 300,000 Direct labour hours 2,500 Y 500,000 Direct labour hours 4,800 Z 100,000 Machine hours 1,200 Additional information:
The selling and distribution overheads are absorbed at 5% of production cost. The firm’s profit mark up is 20%. The firm has received an order for 500 units for Job No.155T, which is estimated to incur costs as follows:
Item Information Direct materials Ksh 420,000 Direct labour — X 110 hours at Ksh 80 per hour Direct labour — Y 60 hours at Ksh 70 per hour Direct labour — Z 40 hours at Ksh 65 per hour Machine time 50 machine hours at Ksh 100 per hour The customer has offered to pay Ksh 600,000 for this job.
(i) Prepare a cost statement for Job No.155T.
(ii) Advise the management on whether to accept the order or not.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| X overhead rate | 300,000/2,500 | 120 per labour hour |
| Y overhead rate | 500,000/4,800 | 104.166667 per labour hour |
| Z overhead rate | 100,000/1,200 | 83.333333 per machine hour |
| Materials | Given | 420,000 |
| X labour | 110 × 80 | 8,800 |
| Y labour | 60 × 70 | 4,200 |
| Z labour | 40 × 65 | 2,600 |
| Direct machine charge | 50 × 100 | 5,000 |
| X overhead | 110 × 120 | 13,200 |
| Y overhead | 60 × 104.166667 | 6,250 |
| Z overhead | 50 × 83.333333 | 4,166.67 |
| Production cost | Sum of direct costs and factory overhead | 464,216.67 |
| Selling and distribution | Production cost × 5% | 23,210.83 |
| Total cost | Production + selling and distribution | 487,427.50 |
| Profit markup | Total cost × 20% | 97,485.50 |
| Required price | Total cost × 120% | 584,913 |
| Profit at offered price | 600,000 − total cost | 112,572.50 |
Accept on the stated cost and markup basis: Ksh 600,000 exceeds the calculated Ksh 584,913 quotation. The explicit 50 machine hours at Ksh 100 is included as the supplied direct machine charge; departmental overhead is absorbed separately using the stated Z rate.
Question 2(a) — 8 marks
Explain four disadvantages of using Last in First Out (LIFO) method of stock valuation.
Model answer
- Old inventory values: closing stock may contain outdated prices that give a poor indication of current values.
- Complex records: several historic layers may need to be maintained.
- Profit distortion: drawing down old low-cost layers can create misleading profit changes.
- Weak physical-flow match: the method often differs from sensible stock rotation, especially for perishable goods.
Question 2(b) — 12 marks
Sarah and Meshack are employees of Salama Enterprises. The company pays its employees at a rate of Ksh.300 per hour. The following details relate to the last week of March 2023.
Employee Hours worked Sarah 40 Meshack 53 Additional information:
(i) The company allows employees to work for 48 hours per week.
(ii) Bonus is paid using the Rowan scheme.
(iii) Overtime is paid at a time and a half.
For each employee, determine the:
(i) Basic pay for the week.
(ii) Gross pay for the week.
Model answer
Using 48 hours as the allowed time: Rowan bonus = (time saved/allowed time) × actual time × hourly rate. Only positive savings earn a bonus.
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah basic pay | 40 × 300 | 12,000 |
| Sarah time saved | 48 − 40 | 8 hours |
| Sarah Rowan bonus | (8/48) × 40 × 300 | 2,000 |
| Sarah gross pay | 12,000 + 2,000 | 14,000 |
| Meshack basic pay at normal rate | 53 × 300 | 15,900 |
| Meshack overtime premium | (53 − 48) × 300 × 0.5 | 750 |
| Meshack Rowan bonus | Actual time exceeds allowed time | 0 |
| Meshack gross pay | 15,900 + 750 | 16,650 |
Equivalently, Meshack receives normal-hours pay of 48 × 300 = Ksh 14,400 plus full overtime pay of 5 × 450 = Ksh 2,250. Do not add the full overtime payment to basic pay already covering all 53 hours.
Question 3(a) — 8 marks
Dirah Limited inteds to remove cotton soil from a plot measuring 50 by 100 feet. The information relates to the costs.
Item Information Lorry hire Ksh 2,500 per load Supervision fee Ksh 2 per 10 square feet Permit fee Ksh 3,000 Expected lorries 22 fully loaded Excavation cost Ksh 33,000 The company has received an offer of excavating and disposing the cotton soil from the plot at a contract price of Ksh 80,000.
(i) Prepare an operation cost statement.
(ii) Advise the management on whether to accept the offer or not.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Area | 50 × 100 | 5,000 square feet |
| Lorry hire | 22 × 2,500 | 55,000 |
| Supervision | 5,000/10 × 2 | 1,000 |
| Permit | Given | 3,000 |
| Excavation | Given | 33,000 |
| Total internal cost | 55,000 + 1,000 + 3,000 + 33,000 | 92,000 |
| Cost per square foot | 92,000/5,000 | 18.40 |
| Saving if contractor completes all work | 92,000 − 80,000 | 12,000 |
If the offer is from an outside contractor to perform the complete work, accept on cost grounds: Ksh 80,000 saves Ksh 12,000, subject to equivalent scope and quality. If the sentence instead means a customer would pay Dirah Ksh 80,000 to do the work itself, reject that price because it would produce a Ksh 12,000 loss.
Question 3(b) — 12 marks
Twanze Limited produces a perfume that undergoes two processes to completion. The following information relates to the month of April 2023.
Particulars Process I Ksh Process II Ksh Raw materials introduced (50,000 kg) 600,000 — Added materials (268 kg) — 2,680 Direct labour 180,000 20,000 Direct expenses 77,000 266,100 Additional information:
(i) Normal loss expected in process I and process II is 3% and 1% respectively.
(ii) Production overheads are absorbed on the basis of direct labour cost. Total production overheads for the month were Ksh 400,000.
(iii) Scrapped units are sold at Ksh 3 per unit.
(iv) The output from process I and process II was 47,732 units and 47,550 units respectively.
Prepare:
(i) Process I account.
(ii) Process II account.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Process I overhead | 400,000 × 180,000/(180,000 + 20,000) | 360,000 |
| Process II overhead | 400,000 × 20,000/200,000 | 40,000 |
Twanze — Process I
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Total input | 50000 + 0 | 50,000 |
| Total cost | Transfer + materials + wages + overheads + expenses | 1,217,000 |
| Normal loss | 50000 × 3% | 1,500 |
| Expected output | 50000 − 1500 | 48,500 |
| Normal scrap value | 1500 × 3 | 4,500 |
| Cost per good unit | (1,217,000 − 4,500) ÷ 48500 | 25 |
| Actual output value | 47732 × 25.000000 | 1,193,300 |
| Abnormal loss | 48500 − 47732 | 768 |
| Dr particulars | Units | Ksh | Cr particulars | Units | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input / transfer | 50,000 | 0 | Normal loss | 1,500 | 4,500 |
| Materials introduced | 600,000 | Output transferred | 47,732 | 1,193,300 | |
| Direct wages | 180,000 | Abnormal loss | 768 | 19,200 | |
| Overheads | 360,000 | ||||
| Direct expenses | 77,000 | ||||
| Total | 50,000 | 1,217,000 | Total | 50,000 | 1,217,000 |
Twanze — Process II
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Total input | 47732 + 268 | 48,000 |
| Total cost | Transfer + materials + wages + overheads + expenses | 1,522,080 |
| Normal loss | 48000 × 1% | 480 |
| Expected output | 48000 − 480 | 47,520 |
| Normal scrap value | 480 × 3 | 1,440 |
| Cost per good unit | (1,522,080 − 1,440) ÷ 47520 | 32 |
| Actual output value | 47550 × 32.000000 | 1,521,600 |
| Abnormal gain | 47550 − 47520 | 30 |
| Dr particulars | Units | Ksh | Cr particulars | Units | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input / transfer | 47,732 | 1,193,300 | Normal loss | 480 | 1,440 |
| Materials introduced | 268 | 2,680 | Output transferred | 47,550 | 1,521,600 |
| Direct wages | 20,000 | ||||
| Overheads | 40,000 | ||||
| Direct expenses | 266,100 | ||||
| Abnormal gain | 30 | 960 | |||
| Total | 48,030 | 1,523,040 | Total | 48,030 | 1,523,040 |
Process I abnormal loss = 768 units × Ksh 25 = Ksh 19,200. Process II abnormal gain = 30 units × Ksh 32 = Ksh 960. Process II loss is computed on 47,732 transferred units plus 268 introduced units = 48,000. The scan mixes “kg” and “units”; no conversion is provided, so quantities are treated as the same process unit.
Question 4(a) — 8 marks
Explain each of the following terms as used in process costing.
(i) Abnormal loss.
(ii) Abnormal gain.
(iii) Normal loss.
(iv) Scrap value.
Model answer
- Abnormal loss: the loss above the normal allowance, isolated from the cost of efficient output.
- Abnormal gain: the saving when actual loss is below the normal allowance.
- Normal loss: expected unavoidable wastage under efficient process conditions.
- Scrap value: proceeds recoverable from selling the rejected or lost material.
Question 4(b) — 12 marks
The following information relates to contract PX awarded to ABF limited for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Particulars Ksh Material purchases 810,000 Plant purchases 1,900,000 Sub-contractor’s fee 100,000 Direct wages 600,000 Value of work certified 1,850,000 Cost of work not certified 450,000 Electricity expenses 50,000 Additional information:
The contract price was Ksh 2,400,000. Depreciation on plant is charged at the rate of 25% per annum. Cash received during the year was Ksh 1,850,000. On 31 December 2022, unpaid wages amounted to Ksh 80,000.
Prepare:
(i) Contract account.
(ii) Contractee’s account.
(iii) Profit and loss account extract.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Plant depreciation | 1,900,000 × 25% | 475,000 |
| Closing plant | 1,900,000 − 475,000 | 1,425,000 |
| Wages charge | 600,000 + 80,000 | 680,000 |
| Cost incurred | 810,000 + 475,000 + 100,000 + 680,000 + 50,000 | 2,115,000 |
| Work value | 1,850,000 + 450,000 | 2,300,000 |
| Notional profit | 2,300,000 − 2,115,000 | 185,000 |
| Certified completion | 1,850,000/2,400,000 × 100 | 77.08% |
| Conventional profit transfer | 185,000 × 2/3 × (1,850,000/1,850,000) | 123,333.33 |
| Profit reserved | 185,000 − 123,333.3333 | 61,666.67 |
ABF — Contract PX account
| Dr — Particulars | Ksh | Cr — Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 810,000 | Plant c/d | 1,425,000 |
| Plant purchased | 1,900,000 | Work certified | 1,850,000 |
| Subcontractor | 100,000 | Work uncertified | 450,000 |
| Wages paid and accrued | 680,000 | ||
| Electricity | 50,000 | ||
| Notional profit | 185,000 | ||
| Total | 3,725,000 | Total | 3,725,000 |
Contractee account
| Dr — Particulars | Ksh | Cr — Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|
| Work certified | 1,850,000 | Cash received | 1,850,000 |
| Total | 1,850,000 | Total | 1,850,000 |
| Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|
| Profit and loss extract — contract profit | 123,333.33 |
The profit transfer uses the usual examination notional-profit convention for a substantially progressed incomplete contract, adjusted for cash received. No estimated total completion cost is supplied for an estimated-profit method. Cash received equals certified work, so the cash ratio is 1.
Question 5(a) — 8 marks
Explain four limitations of Job order costing in a manufacturing firm.
Model answer
- Detailed recording cost: separate job records require time and administration.
- Allocation judgement: shared overheads may be charged using imperfect bases.
- Delayed information: a complete job cost may only be known after substantial work is finished.
- Limited comparability: customised jobs differ, making reliable standards and comparisons difficult.
Question 5(b) — 12 marks
Sema Limited has three production departments and two service departments. The following overheads were incurred during the year 2022.
Particulars Ksh Machining 1,600,000 Cutting 2,000,000 Stitching 800,000 Canteen 200,000 Maintenance 600,000 Additional information: The service department costs are apportioned to the production departments as follows:
Service Machining Cutting Stitching Canteen Maintenance Canteen 40% 20% 30% — 10% Maintenance 60% 10% 25% 5% — (i) Apportion the service department costs to the production departments using simultaneous equations.
(ii) Determine the total overheads for each production department.
Model answer
Let C and M be the full reciprocal costs of Canteen and Maintenance.
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Canteen equation | C = 200,000 + 0.05M | |
| Maintenance equation | M = 600,000 + 0.10C | |
| Substitute | C = 200,000 + 0.05(600,000 + 0.10C) | |
| Collect terms | 0.995C = 230,000 | |
| Canteen total | 230,000/0.995 | 231,155.78 |
| Maintenance total | 600,000 + 0.10C | 623,115.58 |
| Production department | Initial Ksh | Canteen allocation Ksh | Maintenance allocation Ksh | Final Ksh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machining | 1,600,000 | 92,462.31 | 373,869.35 | 2,066,331.66 |
| Cutting | 2,000,000 | 46,231.16 | 62,311.56 | 2,108,542.71 |
| Stitching | 800,000 | 69,346.73 | 155,778.89 | 1,025,125.63 |
| Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|
| Check: final production totals | 5,200,000 |
| Original total overheads | 5,200,000 |
Question 6(a) — 8 marks
Explain four functions of a cost accountant in a manufacturing firm.
Model answer
- Measure costs: collect and classify material, labour and overhead expenditure.
- Plan and budget: prepare cost estimates, standards and resource budgets.
- Control performance: analyse variances and report waste or inefficiency.
- Support decisions: provide relevant cost information for pricing, make-or-buy and product decisions.
Question 6(b) — 12 marks
Fillah Limited had two production departments J and K and two service departments, L and M. The overheads incurred during the year 2022 is as follows:
Particulars Ksh Indirect labour 3,800,000 Lighting 360,000 Rent 1,200,000 Depreciation on machinery 750,000 Additional information:
Departmental data J K L M Area occupied (m) 15 30 10 5 Value of machinery (Ksh) 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 Number of employees 20 11 4 3 Prepare an overhead apportionment sheet.
Model answer
Use employee numbers for indirect labour; floor area for lighting and rent; machinery values for depreciation. The driver totals are 38 employees, 60 area units and Ksh 7,500,000 machinery.
| Overhead | Basis | Total Ksh | J | K | L | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect labour | 20:11:4:3 | 3,800,000 | 2,000,000 | 1,100,000 | 400,000 | 300,000 |
| Lighting | 15:30:10:5 | 360,000 | 90,000 | 180,000 | 60,000 | 30,000 |
| Rent | 15:30:10:5 | 1,200,000 | 300,000 | 600,000 | 200,000 | 100,000 |
| Depreciation | 3:2:1:1.5 | 750,000 | 300,000 | 200,000 | 100,000 | 150,000 |
| Total | 6,110,000 | 2,690,000 | 2,080,000 | 760,000 | 580,000 |
No basis is supplied for reallocating L and M to production, so this is the primary apportionment sheet.
Question 7(a) — 8 marks
Explain four characteristics of batch costing.
Model answer
- A batch of similar units is treated as the cost object.
- Direct materials and labour are recorded for each batch.
- Setup and overhead costs are charged or apportioned to the batch.
- Unit cost is total batch cost divided by the number of good units in the batch.
Question 7(b) — 8 marks
The following information relates to Ebbat enterprises for the year ended 31st December 2022.
Particulars Ksh Raw materials (1 January 2022) 40,000 Raw materials (31st December 2022) 50,000 Labour cost 1,260,000 Factory power 260,000 Plant at cost 4,000,000 Factory supervisor’s salary 150,000 Carriage on raw materials 110,000 Work in progress (1 January, 2022) 70,000 Work in progress (31 December 2022) 90,000 Materials returned to suppliers 35,000 Purchases of raw materials 720,000 Additional information:
(i) Depreciation on plant is at the rate of 5% per annum on cost.
(ii) A third of the labour cost is indirect cost.
(iii) The manufacturing profit is at 20%.
Prepare a cost statement.
Model answer
| Step / item | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Direct labour | 1,260,000 × 2/3 | 840,000 |
| Indirect labour | 1,260,000 × 1/3 | 420,000 |
| Depreciation | 4,000,000 × 5% | 200,000 |
| Particulars | Ksh |
|---|---|
| Opening raw materials | 40,000 |
| Purchases | 720,000 |
| Carriage inward | 110,000 |
| Less materials returned | -35,000 |
| Less closing raw materials | -50,000 |
| Direct materials consumed | 785,000 |
| Direct labour | 840,000 |
| Prime cost | 1,625,000 |
| Indirect labour | 420,000 |
| Factory power | 260,000 |
| Supervisor’s salary | 150,000 |
| Depreciation | 200,000 |
| Factory cost before WIP | 2,655,000 |
| Add opening WIP | 70,000 |
| Less closing WIP | -90,000 |
| Cost of completed production | 2,635,000 |
| Manufacturing profit: 20% of cost | 527,000 |
| Transfer value | 3,162,000 |
The usual manufacturing-profit markup on cost is used. If 20% were intended as a margin on transfer value instead, transfer value would be 2,635,000/0.8 = Ksh 3,293,750, with profit Ksh 658,750. The supplied 8-mark allocation is retained.